Judge Aileen Cannon of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida is set to hold a crucial hearing on Friday to examine the legality of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s appointment and the funding of his investigations into former President Donald Trump.
This follows her indefinite postponement of the trial related to Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified records. As per to the source cbsnews
Former Attorney General Ed Meese has filed an amicus brief, arguing that Attorney General Merrick Garland’s appointment of Smith, a private citizen at the time, violates the Constitution’s appointments clause.
Meese contends that Smith, not being a government official at the time of his appointment, lacks the authority to serve as special counsel.
Related Articles:
Trump’s Tax-Free Tips Proposal: A Game Changer for Service Workers
Shapiro to Trump: Focus on America’s Greatness, Not Divisiveness
Judge to Review Legality of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s Appointment in Trump Case
Garland appointed Smith on November 18, 2022, shortly after Trump announced his 2024 presidential bid.
In response to the challenge, Garland defended his decision, citing long-standing regulations that allow the attorney general to appoint special counsel.
Friday’s hearing will feature arguments from Trump’s defense team, federal prosecutors, and amici, including Meese. The contention is that Smith’s appointment was unconstitutional, rendering his authority invalid.
This legal debate has broader implications, as the Supreme Court is also considering related arguments in a separate case involving Smith.
The outcomes of these hearings could significantly impact the ongoing investigations and the legal landscape surrounding special counsel appointments.
Additional hearings and deadlines in the case are scheduled, with key disclosures expected in early July, coinciding with Trump’s upcoming sentencing in Manhattan on July 11.